Thanks Kelly for sharing. Indeed most of what you mention is how I am considering it too. But with a lol -- as I am somewhat /unsure about what the ibs actually mean by things like 'galaxies' etc in relation to what we on earth mean by it. I guess it would have been better for the ibs to clarify this to avoid any further confusion... IF we (i.e you. me and probably more lol) are on the right track in trying to understand.From what I understand, the 'galaxies' in the dimensions are not the same ones we see in the physical reality. The dimensional existence was an existence 'all unto itself' from that perspective, where there was all kinds of things in the dimensions that were not physically manifested in physical reality, and thus an extensive point of separation as it's not existing within/as the physical reality but in separation from it, just like the mind. So in the dimensions things are not physical - so you could have bricks, but they are not 'physical' bricks, the physical being like lots and lots of relationships compressed until it is 'dense' to a point of 'solidity' like the physical now is. It's difficult to comprehend what things would be like in the dimensions, which is without the solidity/substance of the physical, coming from within only our understanding of perceptions/senses based on what we have within/from our physical bodies through the specific systems of senses like 'sight' and 'touch', where it's difficult to conceive of for example 'sight/seeing' existing in some other way than interpreting light refractions that translates into shapes and depths and colors and into pictures. So for instance, when I consider what/how would seeing be in the dimensions without physicality, I look at what would 'seeing' be as a lived expression? Like if I died/no longer had a pysical body. Like for example you might describe it - 'the recognition of what is here', which doesn't require eyeballs and such, because we for example don't use our eyeballs when we introspectively 'see into ourselves'. It's a self movement/expression of 'seeing' but not a 'physical seeing' that is done with the eyes seeing picture representations. So, our comprehension of reality in it's totality has really been limited through our limited perceptions of reality through the physical senses, because for example we don't see everything that is here in existence through our eyes. The physical sight is though a cool tool to facilitate physical movement as physical beings in the physical reality at the moment.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests