We are one within the consideration that we are all here and at a substance physical level 'made of the same' life - yet this doesn't mean we are 'living as life' yet. A note on the Unified Consciousness Field: it no longer exists, everything that was specifically holding it was dismantled at the same time that the white light construct was dismantled and else at dimensional levels.I get it, right/wrong, light/dark, good/evil, exist as polarity, which is a system of the mind. We are One, connected by the Unified Conciousness Field, I am the reality I previously thought I existed in.
Yes and no. How it has been recently worded is that you're Not only your mind, you're not only your memories, yet you ARE your mind, memories, thoughts etc. as that which each one of us has accepted and allowed ourselves to become. So to 'take a stand' in fact means: I take responsibility for this that I have become as an individual which entails my mind, my body, everything that I have become at an individual and world-system level. Who we really are is what is explained as 'life' as that which is our fullest potential and that which one can uncover as oneself as you walk through the practical process of walking your mind/ taking responsibility for your mind through the tools of writing, self-forgiveness, self-honesty and self corrective practical application.And.. I am here, in this physical experience, to birth myself as life from the physical. I am here to take a stand for who I really am. I'm not my mind, I'm not my memories, I am a being in a state of being and becoming.
Now, please help me to understand so that others may too, what exactly are we allowing to manifest that should not be made manifest? Is this up to me? An example: a man kills a woman. The woman shot first, she was angry at him. The man then shoots the woman back in self-defense. She dies, he's in a coma. It becomes a legal matter, the law lets the man go free because he was acting in self-defense. Well, I don't want to live in a world of people killing people, yet I allowed this situation to occur. Why? Is this just the state of our world, necessary steps to take to purify existence? "It is what it is" some say. By picking either side, the man or the woman, I am buying into a system of right and wrong. This neutrality is a terrible way to live, I must pick a side. Who was right? Who was wrong?
No, what's best for all is not the same as measuring what's good or bad - what's best for all is a physical mathematical assessment of the consequential outflows of every action, word that you create, that you allow yourself to exist as - there cannot be a 'right or wrong' in physical events, a right or wrong is only a Mind-assessment, it has nothing to do with the physical outcome of something. So, why not instead of trying to fit the 'bad' or 'good' polarity of morality, you rather push yourself to step outside of that need to frame things within such polarity and start thinking in 'what's best for all' terms?We gauge what is "right" and "wrong" by determining if it is best for all or not. If so, we allow it. If not, we don't allow it. We manifest these situations to help us face ourselves, and then we make a "choice" (which is an illusion). We "choose" to not allow it again. We "choose" to allow justice, truth, self-honesty. But by making that very "choice" we define an experience as good and best for all. More clarification on right and wrong please. Actions have consequences. Maybe we label things "bad" if we perceive actions to have less-than-best-for-all consequences, and "good" if they are best-for-all.
No, I disagree. War is not a necessary evil, that's the kind of excuses that we give to ourselves in order to justify the expenses of war, which means this is mostly part of the brainwashing people get through media. No war would exist if there was no money behind it. Do we exist within wars in our lives? For sure, in our minds, between one another and once again, notions of power, control, money exist within such conflicts. So, war is a result of us living in our minds and being guided by self-interest instead of common sense. Here instead of seeing 'who's wrong' which is you wanting to frame things between the bad and good mentality, rather look at what is common sense: to support self abuse and destruction or to stop self abuse and destruction? Then you see that what's best for all is then a point to take back as a realization of seeing ok how can I stop war within myself. So yes, the starting point is ourselves, and that's why stopping wars will be a process of stopping within ourselvesLook at war: I think it is a necessary evil. The way the world works in this moment, war has been and still is inevitable. The starting point, the conflict and tension builds pressure and manifests in violent destruction. War is a result, a consequence of a point of disharmony. People, leaders, try to resolve the disharmony, taking months or longer. Some even feed the disharmony because they want war. Look back and tell me: who is wrong? the ones stopping the war or the ones fueling the war? If it started from a single starting point, the sequence of events leading to war are already set in motion, inevitable. The ONLY WAY that war won't go on is if the starting point gets corrected. Now I believe in a quantum universe where this is physically possible to change the moment in time when the starting point happened, and that is one way to correct it. In linear time way is through abasement of self and taking control of the situation, seeing what it has become, and painfully back-stepping until you can reconcile the starting point and continue another direction.
I guess I see both sides. I am interested in what Desteni has to say about absolute truth - does it exist?
The ONLY TRUTH? REALITY is the PHYSICAL
There is no truth. There are only realationships. You either are part of what is best for all in all ways or you are in self interest and allows harm to exist in the name of your personal happiness. This is the Alpha and the Omega of this world. The ultimate truth. The ultimate choice. and You decide who you are and that determines the outcome of each individual. The universe is a group and if you are not able to be part of the group, you can work out for yourself what will be the consequence
The foundation of the truth of Here will only be uncovered with self honest self forgiveness. Only those strong enough as individual will fathom self honesty and will live self forgiveness. Ego will never grasp the simplicity of the message of Desteni
Another perspective: (http://desteni.org/a/rauyule-sex-porn-a ... -addiction) "Therefore, it’s not about an addiction being to blame, it’s not about masturbation being to blame, it’s not about the feeling or experience being to blame within masturbation, it’s not about the pictures or fantasies within the mind that is to blame: IT IS YOU, YOURSELF that is responsible… You are the one not stopping yourself."
The author points out that masturbation is literally rape when you masturbate to the thought of another, you steal their energy during orgasm. So masturbation is rape and theft. I agree unless it's consensual, then that's not the case. Why, then, is masturbation not to blame? yet masturbation is rape and rape is bad? Does anyone see what I'm trying to get at here? Please I hope someone understands.
Thank you Marlen this is exactly what I was looking for. To see things wholly is to transcend the mind, to see the situation as "what is" and to trust instinct, not emotion, to guide you next. Am I correct?Therefore, you don't have to 'pick a side' - to develop self honesty is to understand such situation from the holistic perspective of seeing two individuals, within a relationship construct of friction and conflict that accumulated reactions within each other to such an extent that it ended up in such level of abuse =both are equally responsible for their actions and mind possession - and you, you can only make sure that you do not allow yourself to be possessed in an equal manner
Yes, what then becomes our 'guiding point' is precisely this consideration of what is best for all, what is the common sense on this? A way I practiced to develop this was through reading people's questions and general living situations and how they were also directed/supported by others here within common sense, that is a practical way you can also apply for yourself in reading blogs and a general 'problematic' shared and how one goes through writing it out, applying self-forgiveness, self-honesty developing common sense and self-honestyTo see things wholly is to transcend the mind, to see the situation as "what is" and to trust instinct, not emotion, to guide you next. Am I correct?
Master the mind and it 'serving us' - you can see how the mind is not something separate from you so mastering the mind is really about developing the ability to direct yourself one and equal to your mind, which means no longer being directed by emotions/energy/feelings but always having a clear common sensical understanding of how you can direct yourself to establish common sense = the consideration of what's best for all. In this the mind is thus not about 'it' serving 'us' but simply realizing it as a part of who we are and as such Self-Direction implies me directing myself as my body, my mind, my life that I take responsibility for here.I enjoy stretching out this idea of "what is wrong, what is right" because I think it helps to overcome the mind by revealing its place in our lives, then allowing us to master the mind to the point that it serves us, not the other way. I will pick one word: harmony. I believe harmony should be sought after. Harmony is equality. I believe harmony is good. How would you escape this mind construct believing harmony is good? Thanks.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest