Larys' Blogs

[Larys]

My blogs:
http://laryskaziukonis.wordpress.com/
http://equalitycanbeareality.blogspot.com/

Which you can also visit via NetworkedBlogs:
http://apps.facebook.com/blognetworks/b ... aziukonis/
http://apps.facebook.com/blognetworks/b ... _equality/

[Larys]

Competition and inferiority
12.07.2011

I’ve noticed a peculiar thing within me. When I make mistakes when nobody is seeing me, looking at me — I don’t really care much about them, but just re-assess something to deal with the mistake and to make a correction if it can be done and would be cool, or leave it as it is.

But when I am making a mistake and it’s seem/might be seen by others, I am suddenly going into all kinds of reactions within my mind, thinking that I have made a mistake, starting to charge self-definitions of inferiority, inadequacy and all kinds of bullshit like that within the mind — even though I am well aware that it’s bullshit (which is quite interesting, showing the self-denial of the systematic reactive mind).

I see that there is a competition point, in terms of comparison within such situations, that I look at people as everyone is presenting a perfect-picture presentation of themselves — as far as they are capable of, and that I react to that specifically, through comparing myself within a situation where I am making a mistake to the people around me that can see/are seeing me, and that I am making within my mind (automatically) an assessment of the situation, like ‘omg who is watching me’, and assessing them according to what they are according to how they are presenting themselves which is based on comparison, therefore on competition through not wanting to be ‘worse’ then the people that I am comparing myself to, (as the witnesses of my mistake) and checking out if I am ‘falling out to far behind’ with that what I am doing in comparison to others that see my mistake, and/or are witnessing a situation where I make a mistake, or do something embarrassing.


Link to the original post:
http://laryskaziukonis.wordpress.com/2011/07/12/competition-and-inferiority/

[Larys]

Insecurity and fear as a sign of strength
19.07.2011

Conformity in our current society is perceived as a sign of strength. I find it ‘upside down’ that it is so (as it’s an expression of fear) – but yes, conformity is perceived as a sign of strength. Let’s take a male for example, males tend to pretend that they are strong, tough, are able to stand up for themselves – especially with this ego mentality of “nobody fucks with me”. But how does that really compares to the reality (especially the ones that act like they’re strong, and “nobody fucks with them”)?

Males that especially pretend to be tough, and are very much driven by their ego through which they present themselves, are usually people that are the biggest conformists of them all. They usually subscribe with how they are acting to certain groups, subcultures, fashion styles etc. and they base their picture as strong and tough on that point, which obviously implies that they HAVE to conform to a certain standard to be able to built their self-value, through a picture presentation (yes, very much like the females, but in a bit different way). So basically what a guy who wants to be perceived as strong do – is try to ‘paint’ a picture presentation of himself as strong, and ‘fit’ into certain fashion, cultural pre-existing designs, to be able upon/through that – built a picture presentation through wearing certain clothes, acting in a certain way, moving in a certain way, and talking in a certain way – a picture of how he wants to be perceived as – for instance as some kind of a though guy.

And basically all that is a lie, and is just proving that the person is insecure, because he is dependent on how others perceive him – as he wants to build his personality based on being approved as a ‘tough guy’ by others, through being perceived as that by others. Which means that the want to be perceived as a tough guy, and the building of picture presentation to get a certain reaction in the first place is actually coming from insecurity. And simplistically speaking – you don’t have to prove something that you are, as you are that in fact.

Here I have just taken on an example of a ‘tough guy’, but there are much more expressions where conformity is perceived as strength, like religion (people believe they are strong just because they are conforming to being a zombie blindly following something), socially accepted opinions (people who are repeating stuff that everyone agree). There is more of this kind of ‘reversed logic’ existing on a massive scale within our world, which doesn’t really makes any sense at all, yet is built to look like something – even though it’s the opposite of what it ‘looks like’ or ‘present itself as’.

And why all this happens? Why things are presented and perceived ‘in reverse’? Why is it so easy to fall into a trap of pictures and perception? Why logic doesn’t work, and is actually ‘in reverse’? Well basically, because we define ourselves (each one individually) through the ego, which is just an ‘idea’ that we have about ourselves, and we align and direct our life according to our ego, where all we experience is the energy of thoughts, emotions and feelings, and within that – we don’t even see the reality of what is here, of who we are and are unable to assess reality. It’s called ‘subjective’ perspective and that it’s unable to be objective within assessing something, but while we aren’t aware of any and everything that is here in every moment, we certainly are able to consider everything equally, through a 1+1=2 simplistic assessment. And what does that require, is to actually live, and base your assessments on a living reality of who you are – and not thoughts, imaginations, ideas. And in the light of that – the perception that we’re ‘unable’ to be objective, is just an excuse to not challenge one’s own ego, and see it for what it is in fact – just a lie, that is made of our thoughts that we choose to ‘hold unto’ – instead of applying self-honesty in every moment, and seeing yourself as who you actually are, and live life for real.

Link to the original article:
http://laryskaziukonis.wordpress.com/2011/07/19/insecurity-and-fear-as-a-sign-of-strength/

[Larys]

Morality and how it works
26.07.2011

Morality is the separation that we create in our minds from the world, to be able to not experience guilt. It is also a mind construct that we participate in and accept extensively – because it allows us to abdicate responsibility for the world as a whole, as a way/method to deny the consequential nature of this world, and the effects of our participation here, that simplistically has impact on everything very specifically, as all does in this world of space-time.

Morality is when we conjure ideas within ourselves, of what is ‘wrong’ and what is ‘right’, what we ‘should’ and what we ‘shouldn’t’ do. But in all that (in the whole morality construct and it’s workings) we do not take EVERYTHING into consideration in an equal manner. We only tend to take ourselves, and our perception of what we do according to what we label/define as wrong and right.

Morality as it exists currently is a form and outflow of self-deception, wherein we make certain rules for ourselves as we grow up and are stuffed with all kinds of knowledge and information – and then we according to those rules, through our perceptions compare what we participate in and what others participate in as good/bad, right/wrong in a very polarized way, according to knowledge that we ‘sponged’ up through our life and defined as ‘rules’ that tell us what is right.

Within that – we do not see or consider reality as it is, and the consequential outflows of everything within reality, as we accept a ‘set’ rules to live according to, and that apparently allows us to have a clear conscience. Which exposes the con of CONscience (the science of con) where we through experiments adjust and optimize the rules, on which we base our morality, to be free of experiencing guilt.

So morality is basically a way to run away from the experience of guilt, to separate self from the reality that we’re all creating, acting like everyone is separate and decides for themselves (which is not true as we’re enslaved within a money system, where choice is only available to those who has money) and to built a personality/ego of just and/or righteousness. Which is a blatant lie – if you see how that works. And morality get’s disguised as a “solution” and support of being responsible – while in actuality it’s a way to escape from self-responsibility and from realizing the actual consequences as the causality that is all encompassing in this world, where choice is inseparable from consequence.

Link to the original article:
http://laryskaziukonis.wordpress.com/2011/07/26/morality-and-how-it-works/

[Larys]

Knowledge is useless
02.08.2011

When we look at our current world, full of information and knowledge – where we have such a wide pool of education, it seems that there is always something to learn, and that this stuff that we can learn about all kinds of areas of knowledge is something relevant, and useful. And that is especially relevant now in this internet era – where anyone with internet connection has access to the vast amounts of knowledge that has been gathered by humanity for quite a while.

But I say – knowledge is irrelevant, and is not and can not be the solution for what is here. And that is because, we had all this knowledge for quite a while, and what did it brought us? There is constant starvation in the world, there are people who don’t get treated, because there is not enough money apparently. There are armed conflicts in the world going on constantly – war is like a ‘normal’ and ‘acceptable’ point within our reality. And also, what about people individually being demented – harming others? Abuse is families is sky high, and according to the statistics it is raising every year. Children are being raped – and it usually never goes out to the public, because the victims feel ashamed of that happening to them. People are hating each other, trying to win over one another, prove that they are better – even though they are actually ‘on the same boat’, and instead of working together and finding a way to coexist for the best interest of all, people just abuse and hate each other out of greed/self-interest – which is a lot of times only to satisfy their ego of superiority and nothing else. I mean how fucked up is that?

So in face of all that, it is really plain and simple. The knowledge that we have accumulated, and all the information that all the ‘wise’ and intelligent people have been and are accumulating – is useless, in terms of solving anything. It is just accumulating information like a fucking computer. It has nothing to do with practicality. It has nothing to do with actual solutions that are relevant and would have a real major impact on reality. And so the authority people that are perceived as intelligent, or knowledgeable have in this world, is totally FAKE. Because they are just sponges of information. They are like walking hard drives, with faster or slower processors. They don’t represent anything of actual value. It is really bizarre, that people like that have authority. While it is evident that they haven’t solved anything that is really a problem within this world.

The actual relevance of knowledge is the information itself, and that it grants the ability to do something. Like we can make a computer, because of the knowledge that has been gathered – about the materials firstly from which the parts were made, then also the tools that were required to from the parts itself, then the knowledge about electricity, magnetism etc. But it’s just knowledge. It doesn’t make a person significant – just because the person has accumulated knowledge. It just allows a person to be able to do something where the knowledge can be applied. But that is not solving anything AT ALL.
because war machines – are also made by engineers that are knowledgeable. And that is simply creating and supporting abuse in this world.

And here also a cool point would be to look at people that are well educated and were able to get into a higher position in society, which granted them a lot of money. Do they care about what is really going on in this world, and are using their intellect to benefit all living beings? NO, THEY CANNOT, because they are usually required to stay in a certain mindset, and present a certain worldview in the branch of knowledge that their educated in, because if not – they might loose their position that they worked for, for years. Which is why, people that might care, that are in high positions in education, will never ‘break’ out of the bullshit that is being sustained in this world as apparently a system that works in the benefit of everyone (which includes, education, money, family structure, religion, how people act – all of it).

But, what is the solution as knowledge is just information, without any grand value or meaning. The solution is obviously SELF. Who we are – as who we are, is the SOURCE of all that is here. We are the ones that create, as ourselves. It is in the very ‘who we are’, that determines, how anything is used within this world. It is nothing separate from us that decides or dictates what we’re allowing or doing. It is always US. And therefore by this example it is very visible that, it is not knowledge that is the key to anything. It is ‘who we are’, as the accepted and allowed nature of ourselves that decides. Because knowledge is but a tool. It’ s like a knife, or a hammer. It doesn’t have any value in/by itself. It is we, who make it work a certain way. It is we – who direct it, as we’re directing ourselves, always according to what we accept and allow, as that makes up the nature of who we are.

Therefore, to change the world, we have to first change ourselves. It is not about charity. It is not about being a volunteer. It is not in accumulating knowledge, to try and make some supreme machine that would make life easier. Because all that can be in vain, and in terms of technology especially – can turn against us (as it is clearly shown in war, where new technologies are being implemented to cause greater harm). It is in ourselves FIRST. If we are not willing to become self-honest, if we are not willing to forgive ourselves, if we are not willing to challenge our egos, our self-accepted nature of being self-deceptive in every possible way. Then you know, that you don’t care actually. You know, that you’re not here to help anyone. You can be certain that you don’t give a shit, about others, and that all what you apparently do ‘to help others’ is just to build your ego (as the imagined picture of yourself) – and not to help or benefit every living being. Because SELF, is the very point that makes the difference, and if you want to make a difference, that start with yourself.

For support and perspective of, how to approach self-investigation, self-honesty and self-change, investigate Desteni. We are here as a group of people that actually care to make a difference by first challenging ourselves, and working on becoming people that can be effective through firstly facing all our own bullshit and deception. And while we purify ourselves, we also work towards a solution that can be applied worldwide, which is the Equal Money System. If you don’t want to do all the research by yourself, of what is offered at Desteni, there is a course (the Desteni I Process) that includes the material being presented in a structured way, a buddy to support you online through the course material, and in your own application and issues you might face, and also involves an income plan as a multi-level marketing, for you to be able to make a decent income through working from home (as a buddy for other people that take the course) – while in the same time supporting a real worldwide solution – as the Equal Money System.

Link to the original article:
http://laryskaziukonis.wordpress.com/2011/08/02/knowledge-is-useless/

[Larys]

Moral rules and conscience
09.08.2011
Okay, in our world, in our cultures, there has always been those ‘rules’, as moral codes that has been accepted as valuable, and something that is somehow required or beneficial for people, in terms of their own ability to discern between good and evil. Same thing goes for the emotional experience that we derive (that is based) on the knowledge we accept as our morality – as conscience.

Both of these is basically connected to the knowledge we ourselves gather and carry within ourselves, as our morality, of what is good and evil, what we should and shouldn’t do, as our definition (as knowledge) of good and evil. Now I say that it’s all useless, and really shows that we are totally separated from our reality (as humanity, as a whole), and that we have no regard for anything that is here living – at all.

Because why would we need knowledge to tell us what is good and bad? I mean, there is a question to be asked here – if we need to be told what is good and bad, doesn’t that makes us really vile creatures? I mean, if we as individuals, aren’t able to discern that without firstly having to be filled with knowledge, means that we are insignificant, ignorant and unable to even see things as they are, and that it shows that we aren’t even alive. I mean, if someone is unable to discern good and evil, until he had an information input (which is essentially something that any hard drive can do, which shows that we are just programmed walking memory based machines) – then how can that be called a state of being alive? We are robots, that are not even able to discern what harms life? I mean that also would imply that we aren’t even alive, we are just information machines, that get programmed and are able to program ourselves through information to do certain things – but there is no life in that.

I mean what is conscience? Conscience is the emotional reaction, which can be called an experience – that is based on the pre-programmed information/knowledge, that we’ve gathered about what is ‘right’ and what is ‘wrong’. I mean, isn’t that fucking limited? Just have a look at the ‘program of conscience’ – it is not ‘turned on’ when actual suffering takes place. It is only ‘on’ when you see a direct picture (for instance) of harm – then you might feel guilt, and then it’s all gone (the whole energetic/emotional experience) – you don’t even recall that to much, later on. Which just shows, that we are actually walking memory, and that we only react to pictures and memories (which is the input, which shows we are actually totally and entirely programmable robots).

And furthermore, while conscience is obviously a ‘fake’ ‘function’ – we actually keep on going with it, and we for ages have been accepting it as a ‘compass’ to help us discern right from wrong. I mean, go and watch some cartoons about super heroes, you’ll notice how conscience is being presented as a ‘compass’ of what is right and wrong. Same with books, and same with how people tend to think generally.

And that is really, really a problem. Just look at it, we are programmed, or can program ourselves through information, that tells us what is right and what is wrong, to have a certain emotional reaction – and that is what our conscience consist of. If conscience would be real – you would experience a reaction, every time someone is harmed – as we are all collectively accepting harm. And if conscience would be real, then we wouldn’t have starving people, we wouldn’t have people, who have to steal food to live, we wouldn’t have homeless people, we wouldn’t have children that turn to prostitution – just to make a living, we wouldn’t have animal abuse, we wouldn’t have bullying, we wouldn’t have wars, we wouldn’t have (basically) any form of abuse in this world that is done through a collective consensus (as the examples I’ve picked were specifically, towards points that are accepted by everyone, because their cause is the current money system, accepted by everyone). And obviously conscience doesn’t ‘see’ that, because it only works based on information/knowledge, that we have ‘saved’ in our memory, that tells us what is ‘right’ and ‘wrong’ – without actually understanding what is here in fact, and doing something with it.

Conscience just makes you go into guilt. It is not practical, because it will (and have never) brought people to a point where they have changed the system that is accepted collectively, which is the system that caused all the abuse in the world. I mean, most of the abuse in the world is based on lack. And that is due to the collective acceptance of a system of lack and debt. And that has NEVER been addressed by conscience, which is just a reaction program that is based on ‘moral rules’ and general knowledge made out of the definitions of what is right and wrong.

Investigate Equal Money and Desteni, as we are here moving towards real solutions, that are born from actual investigation and not just compounding of the already existing knowledge (as it has always been) – starting from the very root, which is ourselves. It is really obvious that as robots, we won’t create anything of worth, as we are just able to repeat that what has been our input, therefore investigate what research has been made, and what tools are presented at Desteni in terms of how to actually see how we are programmed individually, and how to learn to see, and be able to purify self through self-honest investigation, and practical application of writing and self-forgiveness.

Link to the original article:
http://laryskaziukonis.wordpress.com/2011/08/09/moral-rules-and-conscience/

[Larys]

Desteni: The Solution of Self-Honesty
16.08.2011

Desteni is the first international group of people that stood for universal equality, that have agreed upon and realized that the endeavor to self-honesty is absolutely required to make any real change in the world. We recognize that it is a necessity, for people to participate in a group effort to be able and to become leaders and that we must stop placing hope into a single person or idea – as history has proven, that it is always bound to fail.

Let’s just have a look at only to the very simplistic point of self-honesty, because Desteni is the first group or ‘body’ that has every placed self-honesty as the point that should be the basic guideline – to be firstly self-honest with yourself. I mean how bizarre is that – that no other body/organization have never stood for such a simplistic, self-empowering and straight-to-the-point solution and understanding that actually place everyone equal to each other? Because within self-honesty, things like money, status, how someone looks etc. are irrelevant, because what is relevant is for you to be honest with you. It’s not about people telling one another what to do, but to sit with yourself and actually have a look yourself.

How come that has never been mentioned, pointed out, professed so clearly and in such a straight-foreword way? Just by saying “stick to self-honesty”. We had so many religions, so many gurus, philosophies, myths, life-coaches, spiritual ideas and concepts all centered (apparently) around making a human being something more, around self-perfection, around building stability within self – while NONE that have lived to these days, and those that are being promoted now has stated the principle of self-honesty so directly and simplistically. You have to wonder (at least!).

And why that has happened? There are few reasons if one look at such ‘manifestations’ (let’s call them that) which I have just mentioned – why none of such have never stood for self-honesty. Well one was, that all people creating and taking a part in such ‘manifestations’ haven’t stood for what they said really (it was always deceptive) – intentionally or unintentionally, but if not intentionally then blindly. Another one is that none of such ‘manifestations’ were actually standing for equality, as the best interest of all (although many have abused the word as just a catchy nice sounding ideal), and that was because self-honesty brings forth actual equality, because such points as control and hierarchy aren’t maintainable when people are becoming self-honest. Because those two points are based on all kinds of deceptive, manipulative or forceful ways to be maintained. When people are self-honest, they actually see what is going on, because they become clear in themselves, and actually are able to discern for themselves. Besides, if the head of one of those ‘manifestations’ claim self-honesty (which is quite a dare to self), and wouldn’t be able to be actually self-honest themselves, then it is very, very, very easy to see that for people actually would be working towards self-honesty themselves.

Self-honesty is the OBVIOUS key as ‘SELF-ONENESS-KEY’ (hear the sound) – where SELF can give oneself a KEY to be ONE within self, and no more separated into pieces as which one is unable to see anything directly, or to have any self-direction, because of being separated into so many parts through all kinds of apparently ‘little lies’ that we keep on allowing within ourselves. Meantime self-deception has become the very core of ourselves, and our very ‘beingness’ through our own permitance. That is the point of self-honesty – the ‘self-oneness-key’, to become ONE within yourself, no more to be separated into multiple parts and pieces, where one is unable to ‘piece’ anything together to see it as it is directly, and is unable to bring ‘peace’ into ones own experience of self, and the world as a whole.

So, you can have a look and see for yourself, start applying self-honesty, start applying self-forgiveness (self-change), and have a look that we are actually able to be more then just fearful beings, that run rampant in this world without any direction, without any self-trust, only looking for someone who gives us some hope that we are apparently already something more or will become that after death. We will never be anything more, until we actually sit and look at the REALITY of who we are within this world, and at this world, and take on the endeavor towards self-honesty, and to take off the veils of self-deceit that we allow to be blinded with. Where we are making it unable for ourselves to build our lives on a rock. And we keep constantly are choosing and trying to base ourselves on some thoughts, beliefs or ideas that have no substance.

Link to the original article:
http://laryskaziukonis.wordpress.com/2011/08/16/desteni-the-solution-of-self-honesty/

[Larys]

Equality – is it really so hard?
23.08.2011

Whatever religious affiliation a person would be, can they really say no to “treat another how you would like to be treated yourself”? Do we really need to ‘brand’ ourselves into certain ideas of ‘what is on the other side’ and what governs that what we do not understand, to see the simplicity of “loving thy neighbor”?
Equality has been a concept that has been popping out in various religions, but why didn’t it got really realized in actual living? People seem to have a certain level on consensus towards equality, when it is in terms of certain groups, or points. But what about equality in every way, practically? It is quite simple, actually, what equality is implying. It simply is to treat another living being as you would like to be treated – equally. We can know what is best for another in an instant, it doesn’t require some great wisdom or intelligence. It is the greatest simplicity that can be applied and understood by anyone. It simply require to realize that we are in fact equal in who we are as living beings. There is no complexity, no reasons, and no excuses within this. It is simply what it is.

And fascinating to look at especially, as everyone seems to dream about a world where people have actual respect for each other, and can coexist in harmony – in opposition to the current world, where the abuse, disregard, disrespect, harm and negligence is existent on all the levels of our social coexistence.
Why is it happening? Is there any reason why a person should disrespect, disregard or abuse another? Why would we go to wars, and perpetuate conflicts? Can you give me a good reason why are we allowing that in our personal lives, as well as on the level of whole nations and governments? Can you give me any valid reason for such manifested consequence of what we keep on accepting and allowing within ourselves, and our lives which eventually constitutes what happens on the nation/global scale? I mean any reason at all, why would we actually CHOOSE to direct ourselves, our lives and the people around us to such a destructive way of living?

Well, there aren’t any reasons for doing that, there are only excuses. And all the excuses, has their root based in money. In the unequal redistribution of goods, where some people abuse because they have the possibility, and some allow themselves to be abused because they have no choice to end the abuse because of the financial situation they are in.

For instance – let’s start at the root of society, where the primary unit and environment is the family – children abused within homes accept and allow themselves to be abused, because they are financially dependent on their parents and fear being left alone with no support from anyone (only the system support in which nobody actually cares about you, and you’re only supported financially to a certain age – meaning no actual security). Same with wives or other family members that get abused in their homes – they don’t leave, because it costs money. So people actually take the steps to stop such situation and use the basic support provided by the system, when they are really desperate, and till that point where they are absolutely desperate, they will keep on allowing abuse extensively – just because of the money system.

And similarly, other pointless abusive situations are being accepted and allowed by people, because they don’t have the possibility to get out of them, because of the money limitation. And it is quite striking that even when a lot of pathological situations like these get highlighted by the media, it is never specifically pointed out, that the root problem is how money functions, and how the constant lack of money and security that people have, forces them to accept and allow unspeakable abuse.

But that again brings me back to the question, why are we having such sick stuff happening constantly and continuously in our lives? I mean it’s not ‘how it is because it’s how it is’ – it is what we create through our participation and allowance. To say that things have to be that way – while there is no real reason why that should happen and should be allowed, seems that we’re all having some mental disease that we’re not aware of, because we all have it. And while blaming for all those atrocities the unfair/unequal money system, we’re rejecting a proposition to put into place an equal money system just based on finding excuses while it’s impossible – means that the mental disease that we’re all a subject to has totally infected us and turned us into zombies, where we’ve accepted our own self-defeat and helplessness to the situation – where we’ve became in fact ‘the living dead’.

And in all that It’s unacceptable to burden the future generations with this mess that we haven’t taken care of, pouring our self-defeat unto them through leaving them a mess we’ve never taken on ourselves to deal with, with adding an extra package of our unresolved mental and emotional issues and excuses why we haven’t acted. It is really quite disheartening and sickening how we tend to place hope in the future generations, while not supporting them ourselves through leaving them all the stuff we haven’t dealt with + adding an extra package of our beliefs that didn’t brought anything, except of piles of excuses, limitations, fear, and ideas of what is right and what is wrong – that haven’t changed a thing in how the world works. It is really, sickening that we leave this mess (as the world system) to our children, and with a dose of our accepted self-defeat. And all that just because we’re unwilling to be self-honest and have a look at reality as it is in fact, and what part we actually play in it.

Link to the original article:
http://equalitycanbeareality.blogspot.com/2011/08/equality-is-it-really-so-hard.html

[Larys]

How to find real stability within yourself
30.08.2011

Throughout my life I have found myself often in a situation where I would reacted to a situation, like someone telling me something nasty, or an interaction that I was ashamed of in some way. This would make me later on, in the day when the situation occurred usually to run this situation in my mind over and over again, or thinking about it, rethinking it – even if I wouldn’t like to do that. I was basically having those thoughts coming up in my mind, and while that happening I was obviously experiencing all emotional and feeling reactions that I had while experiencing the situation.

And I mean, I have often wanted to just stop repeating this shit in my mind, but I wasn’t really able to, as the stuff would be coming up in my head over and over again, and usually just stopped when I got distracted, or the emotional charges have died out by their own.

And for me it was something unacceptable, and I couldn’t get why would that happen, as this was basically like being a prisoner in my own mind, as I was experiencing this, as being forced to go into all that reactions. Really bizarre is though, that I haven’t ever really directly questioned the mind back them to the extent that it is a system that basically fucks with us through what we accept and allow.

Which is where come the practical tools presented by Desteni, which are just self-honesty, breathing, writing and self-forgiveness. Pretty simple stuff, and seemingly irrelevant. But the simplicity and practicality of them is just fucking incredible – especially when I look here now at how I am experiencing myself, and have been in the past on the point I’ve written about.

Now, I basically breathe through challenging situations, do self-forgiveness to release the points that are keeping me ‘locked’ (so to speak) in my mind, I apply self-honesty to find direct stability in my world, to see things for what they are and not what I would want them to be, and when experiencing any kinds of reactions I don’t understand, and cannot handle I write.

It’s really simple stuff, but the support and stability I was able to built through that was really incredible. I mean I investigate myself by myself. And I forgive myself, I let go of the shit that I have held to, and allow myself to change, I find stability in breathing, in getting myself here to the physical. I find stability in finding and understanding the reality around through self-honesty, and not trying to impose some ideas and philosophies on reality, letting go of beliefs and the things I have learn to depend on and instead I depend points that I find out about reality through self-honesty. Looking and finding real stability in and through reality, through the physical, not in the mind that cannot be really trusted, as the mind can even fuck you up, with thoughts that you don’t even want (lol).

And now the whole point of ‘not being able to stop thinking about something’ that I’ve described in the beginning is something I don’t really experience. The experiences of intense reactions are not even what they were, as now they are just points that I investigate as they reveal an aspect of myself to me. So basically I have hugely changed my experience at this point already through applying the tools of self-honesty, self-forgiveness, breathing and writing – and pushing myself within that. And I really recommend for you to investigate them and check them out practically if they actually work, because I understand that it might not seem to be much, or to be working (like ‘self-forgiveness can help me? Please!’) but it’s really amazing stuff, which you can only find out if you push yourself to apply it. Especially if you’ve been in situations where you’ve actually noticed that your mind is a system, that can be quite harmful (as I’ve given an example of in this article), as you already have an idea what are you dealing with and that it’s really worth considering and trying out solutions for this, which can completely change your life.

Link to the original post:
http://laryskaziukonis.wordpress.com/2011/08/31/how-to-find-real-stability-within-yourself/

[Larys]

Atheism is a cult
06.09.2011

Atheism is a cult of people who BELIEVE that there is no god, and in most cases also that what is presented by science is ABSOLUTE. So atheists have a blind faith in scientists and science, believing that what they show, and what they can measure is the absolute reality and that there is nothing else.

Obviously to make such a claim is delusional and require a cult mentality, as it implies blind BELIEF and FAITH in a dogma (that there is no god – which is a dogmatic belief base of atheists) and usually also a blind belief and faith that science knows and is able to measure the absolute reality of things and that there is nothings more – which is another dogma.

So basically atheism is a cult of people that support each other in their cult mentality of believing in certain dogmatic paradigms concentrated mostly on battling other cults that are religious in nature (like christians, muslims etc.) who believe in different dogmas about reality (that there’s a specific god, and he does ‘this and that’). While obviously all those are just cults, as they accept certain dogmas about what reality is, and what they believe about what they are not able to check out, see, or understand from their position.

More fascinating should be here why is it so hard for us to realize that we don’t know something about reality? Why people tend to join cults that have certain dogmas, instead of realizing: “ok, I cannot check that out, I don’t know what is after death, I don’t know who or what created it”. Why aren’t we having an attitude of living life according to common sense of caring about one another, placing self into the shoes of another, and in that find out who we are and who can we be, not based on dogmatic beliefs about what we don’t understand, but based on who and what we are living here, in reality.

Obviously or those dogmas about things we cannot check out constitute of information and knowledge. Just like in case of atheists what is shown by science. Why believe that what science present is absolute? Why make a cult, out of science? Why make a cult out of the idea that ‘there is no god’? And believe in that absolutely? Where is that different from any other cult, that excludes people because of not accepting the same belief, the same dogma. Because that is what cults do – they create and accept certain beliefs, dogmas, rituals through which they individualize themselves and create a diversity from other cults, and exclude all who do not accept their beliefs, rituals and dogmas.

And as all cults atheists are just people who do not want to take responsibility for themselves and the world, and just create dogmas to believe in, fighting with people with other dogmas – that are other cults – to superiorize themselves from other cults, and prove their existence and reason and ‘rightness’ through fighting other cults with different dogmas. And all this proving right and wrong, all this fighting and opposition and exclusion is necessary for the cult members to create their apparent identity. And they require that obviously, because as all cults atheists join this cult to not just live life equally with all living beings here, and concentrate on what is really at hand, finding solutions for the problems we face in the world. Instead as all cults they are concentrated on creating fake and illusionary separation through exclusion (as all cults do) and trying to blame other cults (through which they exclude themselves apparently through joining another cult) for all that is here, instead of finding solutions and actually doing something about the mess in their individual lives and in the bigger picture, where all are equal, and there is no fucking superior or inferior beings, just because of the dogmas that they accept.

So the practical solution for this would be to stop creating cults, that exclude other people and blame other cults for what people participating in the cults are not willing to take responsibility for. Instead realize that cults are the group manifestations of what we do individually to not take responsibility – we blame, separate ourselves from others through superiority/inferiority ideas and act like it’s “their fault” or that “we’re better then them just because our dogma/god is better then theirs”, just to feel good about oneself, that one is doing ‘the right thing’. There is no right thing, and when you’re excluding someone – it’s just hate. All living being deserve respect and care, and exclusion itself is an act of hate. Obviously any act of abuse require attention and we cannot be ‘all flowery’ and accepting towards crime/abuse – but this is not the case with cults.

Cults are just exclusive groups that exclude each other and people, just because an idea they agreed upon to take on as an absolute dogma, which they use to superiorize themselves from other cults and use as an excuse to blame others and other cults for what is here, to never take self-repsonsibility for what individuals in those cults are accepting and allowing within their lives, and in the world through collective acceptances and allowances.

Link to the original article:
http://laryskaziukonis.wordpress.com/2011/09/06/atheism-is-a-cult/